After hunting around on the net for a couple fo minutes the solution became apparent. You can use Windows Remote Desktop/RDP to connect multi monitors.

Save the RDP connection and then create a shortcut to:

mstsc.exe /span c:\1.rdp

1.rdp being the RDP file saved from the Remote Desktop Connection app

 

Adding and managing users

In this example, I will add a user called damien. You can add as many users as you need in the same way, just replace the username tom with the desired username in the commands.

useradd damien -m -G users

Set a password for Damien in the Linux system user database. If the user Damien shall not be able to login to the Linux system, skip this step.

passwd damien

-> Enter the password for the new user

Now add the user to the Samba user database.

smbpasswd -a damien

-> Enter the password for the new user

If you have the same problem then you probably need to install mpg123.

From the Console logon as root and run the following:

You’ll get something like the following back:

 

router#show dsl interface atm0

ATM0

Alcatel 20150 chipset information

                ATU-R (DS)                      ATU-C (US)

Modem Status:    Showtime (DMTDSL_SHOWTIME)

DSL Mode:        ITU G.992.1 (G.DMT) Annex A

ITU STD NUM:     0x01                            0x1

Vendor ID:       'ALCB'                          'TSTC'

Vendor Specific: 0x0000                          0x0000

Vendor Country:  0x00                            0xB5

Capacity Used:   100%                            62%

Noise Margin:     5.5 dB                         19.0 dB

Output Power:    20.0 dBm                        12.0 dBm

Attenuation:     49.0 dB                         22.5 dB

Defect Status:   None                            None

Last Fail Code:  None

Selftest Result: 0x00

Subfunction:     0x15

Interrupts:      1333 (0 spurious)

PHY Access Err:  0

Activations:     1

LED Status:      ON

LED On Time:     100

LED Off Time:    100

Init FW:         embedded

Operation FW:    embedded

SW Version:      3.8131

FW Version:      0x1A04

 

                 Interleave             Fast    Interleave              Fast

Speed (kbps):          5856                0           448                 0

Cells:                15473                0        192329                 0

Reed-Solomon EC:       7248                0             0                 0

CRC Errors:               3                0             0                 0

Header Errors:            2                0             0                 0

Bit Errors:               0                0

BER Valid sec:            0                0

BER Invalid sec:          0                0

 

LOM Monitoring : Disabled

 

DMT Bits Per Bin

00: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 5 7 8 8 9 9 8

10: 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 3 0 0

20: 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 5 6 7 8 9 9 A A

30: A B B B C C C D D D D D D D D D

40: 0 D D D D D D D 2 D D D D D D D

50: D D C D D C C C C D D D D C D D

60: D C C C C C C C C C C C C B 8 B

70: C C B C C C C C C C C C C B B B

80: B B B A B B A A A A A A A A 8 A

90: A 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 7

A0: 7 5 7 7 7 5 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 7

B0: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 5

C0: 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 0 0 0 0

D0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 4 4 4

E0: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 3

F0: 3 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

 

DSL: Training log buffer capability is not enabled

sh ip int brief

For more detailed information then run

sh ip int

You might wonder why you’d want the HTTP server running; well you need it if you want to install SDM (Cisco Router and Security Device Manager)

 

To enable the web server logon or connect via terminal

Then type the command

enable

Then type

config

Press enter to config from the terminal when prompted

You should see a prompt like (Which is the config prompt):

Router(config)#

Enter the following commands

ip http server
ip http secure-server
ip http authentication local

 

If you intend to install SDM or want to be able to access the router from SSH then you need to add a user account as below:

Username sdm privilege 15 password 0 sdm

That will create a user with the username and password of SDM

 

If you haven’t enabled SSH and or telnet do so using the following commands:
line vty 0 4
login local
transport input telnet ssh

 

So you just removed your Outlook 2007 profile, you’ve created a new profile but outlook wont open?

You’re getting an error similar to:
Cannot start Microsoft Office Outlook. Cannot Open the Outlook Window

Its simple enough to fix, just run the follow flag on Outlook from the command prompt or run:

 

Outlook.exe /resetnavpane

Download MinGW and MSys

MinGW: MinGW Direct download link

MSys: MSys Direct download link

SF Link: Sourceforge MinGW MSys Package Download Page

FFMPEG: FFMPEG

 

Building FFMPEG

It is time to install ffmpeg. Extract downloaded ffmpeg archive in c: folder. If you have not downloaded yet please download now then run MSys.bat file from C:\msys\1.0\ folder. This location will be depend on you MinGW and MSys installation. In the command prompt run the following commands:

$ cd c:/ffmpeg-0.4.7

$ ./configure –extra-cflags=”-mno-cygwin -mms-bitfields” –extra-ldflags=”-Wl,–add-stdcall-alias” –enable-mingw32 –enable-shared –disable-a52 –disable-pp –disable-ffserver –disable-ffplay

$ make

GB7CD was the fat repeater connected to the new reflector, soon followed by the HotSpot based GB3WE.

Having GB3WE connected it seems quite clear that to a user connected via RF to GB7CD that users on GB2WE appear as though they were using any Icom repeater. Their call sign, and user message all get routed through, even in the Dplus log of GB7CD there is no noticeable difference.

I don’t see how any objection could be based on little more than Myth that has prevented GB3WE and other node adapters being connected to the other UK Reflectors.

The MidStar D-Star repeaters are to start using port B on Ref21, where they also intend to make use of node adapter based repeaters, to complement their current Icom based one.   Â

I understand there has been a lot of interest in exactly where Reflector 21 is located and the kind of hardware and network connections used. Here is the low down, its located in London at a Blueconnex Data centre
The hardware is a Quad Core Xeon, 4GB of Ram, Mirrored disks The network connectivity is provided currently by a Duplex 100Mbps port, which has the capacity to be a 1Gbps port, but I’ve turned it down on the switch, as I doubt we need 1Gbps.

Internet Connectivity to most of the UK is via LINX which should provide a decent low hop count to ADSL lines which so many reflectors use. From other systems connected in different Datacentres around London, the average lag seems to be about 3ms, with about 10ms from Cardiff’s GB7CD over ja.net   Â

By all means feel free to connect your node adapters to the reflector. If it doesn’t work disconnect it. We wont ban you!

Here is a diagram showing the traditional way of interconnecting 4 batteries to form one larger bank. This is a method that we still see in many installations.

 

Method 1

Notice that the connections to the main installation are all taken from one end, i.e. from the end battery.  The interconnecting leads will have some resistance. It will be low, but it still exists, and at the level of charge and discharge currents we see in these installations, the resistance will be significant in that it will have a measurable effect.   Typically the batteries are linked together with 35mm cable in a good installation (often much smaller in a poor installation). 35mm copper cable has a resistance of around 0.0006 Ohms per metre so the 20cm length between each battery will have a resistance of 0.00012 Ohms.   This, admittedly, is close to nothing. But add onto this the 0.0002 Ohms for each connection interface (i.e. cable to crimp, crimp to battery post etc) and we find that the resistance between each battery post is around 0.0015 Ohms.

If we draw 100 amps from this battery bank we will effectively be drawing 25 amps from each battery. Or so we think.

In actual fact what we find is that more current is drawn from the bottom battery, with the current draw getting progressively less as we get towards the top of the diagram.

The effect is greater than would be expected.

Whilst this diagram looks simple, the calculation is incredibly difficult to do completely because the internal resistance of the batteries affects the outcome so much.

However look at where the load would be connected. It is clear that the power coming from the bottom battery only has to travel through the main connection leads. The power from the next battery up has to travel through the same main connection leads but in addition also has to travel through the 2 interconnecting leads to the next battery. The next battery up has to go through 4 sets of interconnecting leads. The top one has to go through 6 sets of interconnecting leads. So the top battery will be providing much less current than the bottom battery.

During charging exactly the same thing happens, the bottom battery gets charged with a higher current than the top battery.

The result is that the bottom battery is worked harder, discharged harder, charged harder. It fails earlier. The batteries are not being treated equally.

Now in all fairness, many people say “but the difference is negligible, the resistances are so small, so the effect will also be small”.

The problem is that in very low resistance circuits (as we have here) huge differences in current can be produced by tiny variations in battery voltage. I’m not going to produce the calculations here because they really are quite horrific. I actually used a PC based simulator to produce these results because it is simply too time consuming to do them by hand.

Battery internal resistance = 0.02 Ohms
Interconnecting lead resistance = 0.0015 Ohms per link
Total load on batteries = 100 amps

The bottom battery provides 35.9 amps of this.
The next battery up provides 26.2 amps.
The next battery up provides 20.4 amps.
The top battery provides 17.8 amps.

So the bottom battery provides over twice the current of the top battery.

This is an enormous imbalance between the batteries. The bottom battery is being worked over twice as hard as the top battery. The effects of this are rather complex and do not mean that the life of the bottom battery will be half that of the top battery, because as the bottom battery loses capacity quicker (due to it being worked harder) the other three batteries will start to take more of the load. But the net effect is that the battery bank, as a whole, ages much quicker than with proper balancing.

 

Method 2

 

All that has changed in this diagram is that the main feeds to the rest of the installation are now taken from diagonally opposite posts.  It is simple to achieve but the difference in the results are truly astounding for such a simple modification.   The connecting leads, in fact, everything else in the installation remains identical.   Also, it doesn’t matter which lead (positive or negative) is moved, Whichever is easiest is the correct one to move.   The results of this modification, when compared to the original diagram are shown below. Only that one single connection has been moved.

 

After this simple modification, with the same 100 amp load….

The bottom battery provides 26.7 amps of this.
The next battery up provides 23.2 amps.
The next battery up provides 23.2 amps.
The top battery provides 26.7 amps.

This is quite clearly a massive improvement over the first method. The batteries are much closer to being correctly balanced. However they are still not perfectly balanced.

How far is it necessary to go to get the matching equal?

Well, the better the quality of the batteries, the more important it becomes. The lower the internal resistance of the batteries, the more important it is to get them properly balanced.

So that now leaves the question of whether or not there is a wiring method to perfectly balance the batteries.

Before getting to that, it should be pointed out that doing the calculation is not actually required in order to arrive at the ultimate interconnection method. I simply did them to show the magnitude of the problem.

In order to get a better balancing it is simply necessary to get the number of interconnecting links as close as equal between each battery and the final loads.

In the first example the power from the bottom battery passed through no interconnecting links. The top battery passed through 6 links.

In the 2nd example (the much improved one), the power from the top and bottom battery both passed through a total of 3 links. That from the middle 2 batteries also both passed through 3 links which begs the question “why were they not therefore perfectly balanced?”. The answer is that some of the links have to pass more total current and this therefore increases the voltage drop along their length.

And now we get to the correctly wired version where all the batteries are perfectly balanced.

 

Method 3

This looks more complicated.  It is actually quite simple to achieve but requires two extra interconnecting links and two terminal posts.   Note that it is important that all 4 links on each side are the same length otherwise one of the main benefits (that of equal resistance between each battery and the loads) is lost.   The difference in results between this and the 2nd example are much smaller than the differences between the 1st and 2nd (which are enormous) but with expensive batteries it might be worth the additional work. Most people (myself included) don’t consider the expense and time to be worthwhile unless expensive batteries are being fitted or if the number of batteries exceeds 8.

 

This method isn’t always so easy to install because of the required terminal posts. In some installations there is simply no room to fit these. So, thanks to a colleague, we can also present another wiring method that achieves perfect battery balancing.

 

Conclusion

I’ll be opting for method two, as its simple to install, and with the three batteries I’m opting for the difference in amperage between batteries will be somewhat lower than as above. Once installed I’ll take a few photos